---- Notes ---- Bruh my senior research is a mess but idk, I can use this prolly. Quickfire public lecture v. Planned talk (layman audience) Outreach outline Morgan’s research finding presenter ability correlates to memorability Engagement for analysis and for student benefit Categorizing types of interactions Outline: Basics of IceCube Now was that so hard? Basic goals of personal research Demo explanations Outline/classification explanation Audience applicability Full STEAM + Drill Philly sci fest + quick tailor In the south pole there is a massive particle detector buried under the ice. It’s a kilometer wide and 2 kilometer deep (.6 miles by 1.2 miles), with 80 strips of 60 viewers. Each viewer (called a dom) looks for rare streaks of light caused by a particle called a Neutrino. Most neutrinos pass straight through the ice (and all other objects) but on the slim chance it interacts with the water molecules, it impacts an...
I find myself wanting to be more in my niche. It’s pretty rare I go out of my way to watch TED talks, and when I do I usually already have some connection the the speaker or the topic ( Caitlin Doughty , ). I’m aware that’s limited, but longform lecture is difficult to remain invested in if I don’t already have interest in the topic at hand. The more emotional talk (Murphy) grabbed me much faster, but I also work with architects so I already had a baseline. Ogbu’s black sheep analogy made me curious, but not enough to be completely hooked. I found my attention wavering from Adegbeye’s talk rather quickly, as I felt lost due to the totally foreign concept straight off the bat. The cleanest segue from opener to thesis is Murphy, as he moves from personal connections to his ideas on architecture more organically, but Ogbu has a more compelling story overall. While Adegbeye’s talk is the most impactful, but as I said, the opening wasn’t enough keep me interested. All three tell a sto...